Search the Dagstuhl Website
Looking for information on the websites of the individual seminars? - Then please:
Not found what you are looking for? - Some of our services have separate websites, each with its own search option. Please check the following list:
Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI - Logo
Schloss Dagstuhl Services
Within this website:
External resources:
  • DOOR (for registering your stay at Dagstuhl)
  • DOSA (for proposing future Dagstuhl Seminars or Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshops)
Within this website:
External resources:
Within this website:
External resources:
  • the dblp Computer Science Bibliography

Dagstuhl Seminar 22291

Machine Learning and Logical Reasoning: The New Frontier

( Jul 17 – Jul 22, 2022 )

Please use the following short url to reference this page:



Shared Documents



Machine learning (ML) and logical reasoning have been the two key pillars of AI since its inception, and yet, there has been little interaction between these two sub-fields over the years. At the same time, each of them has been very influential in their own way. ML has revolutionized many sub-fields of AI including image recognition, language translation, and game playing, to name just a few. Independently, the field of logical reasoning (e.g., SAT/SMT/CP/first-order solvers and knowledge representation) has been equally impactful in many contexts in software engineering, verification, security, AI, and mathematics. Despite this progress, there are new problems, as well as opportunities, on the horizon that seem solvable only via a combination of ML and logic.

One such problem that requires one to consider combinations of logic and ML is the question of reliability, robustness, and security of ML models. For example, in recent years, many adversarial attacks against ML models have been developed, demonstrating their extraordinary brittleness. How can we leverage logic-based methods to analyze such ML systems with the aim of ensuring their reliability and security? What kind of logical language do we use to specify properties of ML models? How can we ensure that ML models are explainable and interpretable?

In the reverse direction, ML methods have already been successfully applied to making solvers more efficient. In particular, solvers can be modeled as complex combinations of proof systems and ML optimization methods, wherein ML-based heuristics are used to optimally select and sequence proof rules. How can we further deepen this connection between solvers and ML? Can we develop tools that automatically construct proofs for higher math?

To answer these and related questions we are organizing this Dagstuhl Seminar, with the aim of bringing together the many world-leading scientists who are conducting pioneering research at the intersection of logical reasoning and ML, enabling development of novel solutions to problems deemed impossible otherwise.

Copyright Sébastien Bardin, Vijay Ganesh, Somesh Jha, and Joao Marques-Silva


Related Seminars
  • Dagstuhl Seminar 14442: Symbolic Execution and Constraint Solving (2014-10-27 - 2014-10-30) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl Seminar 19062: Bringing CP, SAT and SMT together: Next Challenges in Constraint Solving (2019-02-03 - 2019-02-06) (Details)

  • Logic in Computer Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Software Engineering

  • SAT/SMT/CP solvers and theorem provers
  • Testing
  • Analysis
  • Verification
  • and Security of Machine Learning
  • Neuro-symbolic AI