https://www.dagstuhl.de/9616

April 15 – 19 , 1996, Dagstuhl Seminar 9616

Loop Parallelization

Organizer

Ch. Lengauer, L. Thiele, M. Wolfe, H. Zima

For support, please contact

Dagstuhl Service Team

Documents

Dagstuhl's Impact: Documents available
Dagstuhl-Seminar-Report 142

Motivation

As parallelism emerges as a viable and important concept of computer technology, the automatic parallelization of loops is becoming increasingly important and receiving increased attention from researchers. The reasons are (1) that programming parallel computers by hand is impractical in all but the simplest applications and (2) that, by exploiting the parallelism in nested loops, potentially large numbers of processors can be utilized easily and a speed-up of orders of magnitude can be attained.

Methods of loop parallelization have been developed in two research communities: regular array design and parallelizing compilation.
Researchers in regular array design impose regularity constraints on loop nests in order to apply a geometric model in which the set of all parallelizations of the source loop nest can be characterized, the quality of each member of the set can be assessed and an optimal choice from the set can be made automatically. That is, regular array design methods identify optimal parallelizations of regular loop nests.
Researchers in parallelizing compilation are interested in faster methods than their colleagues in regular array design and, therefore, often apply heuristics to attain reasonable but not necessarily optimal parallelizations. Parallelizing compilation methods can often cope with less regular loop nests but do, in general, not produce provably optimal results.

The primary goal of this seminar was to intensify communication between the two communities. In recent years, the methods used in both communities have increasingly converged on the theory of linear algebra and linear programming.

Questions discussed at the seminar included:

  • Algorithms that yield optimal parallelizations are usually computationally complex. For what applications is this (not) a serious restriction? For what applications do heuristic algorithms yield better performance, and what are the heuristics?
  • Loop parallelization methods have yielded static parallelism in the past. How can they be made more dynamic, e.g., for the treatment of while loops or of irregular data structures?
  • What parallel programmable computer architectures should the research in loop parallelization aim at?
  • What do the users of parallelizing compilers expect from loop parallelization?
  • What are the special requirements on design methods for multi-media applications?
  • How can memory management in parallelized programs be made more efficient?

The 41 participants of the workshop came from 9 countries: 14 from the US (funded by the National Science Foundation), 10 from France, 9 from Germany and 8 from other European countries. The organizers would like to thank everyone who has helped to make this workshop a success.

Related Dagstuhl Seminar

Documentation

In the series Dagstuhl Reports each Dagstuhl Seminar and Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop is documented. The seminar organizers, in cooperation with the collector, prepare a report that includes contributions from the participants' talks together with a summary of the seminar.

 

Download overview leaflet (PDF).

Dagstuhl's Impact

Please inform us when a publication was published as a result from your seminar. These publications are listed in the category Dagstuhl's Impact and are presented on a special shelf on the ground floor of the library.

Publications

Furthermore, a comprehensive peer-reviewed collection of research papers can be published in the series Dagstuhl Follow-Ups.