TOP
Suche auf der Schloss Dagstuhl Webseite
Sie suchen nach Informationen auf den Webseiten der einzelnen Seminare? - Dann:
Nicht fündig geworden? - Einige unserer Dienste laufen auf separaten Webseiten mit jeweils eigener Suche. Bitte beachten Sie folgende Liste:
Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI - Logo
Schloss Dagstuhl Services
Seminare
Innerhalb dieser Seite:
Externe Seiten:
  • DOOR (zum Registrieren eines Dagstuhl Aufenthaltes)
  • DOSA (zum Beantragen künftiger Dagstuhl Seminare oder Dagstuhl Perspektiven Workshops)
Publishing
Innerhalb dieser Seite:
Externe Seiten:
dblp
Innerhalb dieser Seite:
Externe Seiten:
  • die Informatik-Bibliographiedatenbank dblp


Dagstuhl-Seminar 09411

Interaction versus Automation: The two Faces of Deduction

( 04. Oct – 09. Oct, 2009 )

(zum Vergrößern in der Bildmitte klicken)

Permalink
Bitte benutzen Sie folgende Kurz-Url zum Verlinken dieser Seite: https://www.dagstuhl.de/09411

Organisatoren

Kontakt



Programm

Press Room

Press Review


Summary

Throughout the history of modern logic, there have been two strands of research: finding natural inference systems for a given problem domain and finding automatic procedures for solving specific logical problems. In computer science, these two strands became interactive and automated deduction. Powerful systems emerged in both camps (Coq, Isabelle, etc. versus Spass, Vampire, etc.), conferences were established, and separate communities developed.

However, none of the two kinds of systems were ideal for program verification. The interactive tools lacked the necessary automation and the automatic tools failed to cater for important aspects like arithmetic. And neither scaled well. Therefore a separate third, application-driven set of techniques and tools were developed. These are based on powerful automatic procedures for particular logical theories, ranging from propositional logic to arithmetic, and their combination, most notably in the form of SMT solvers. At the same time they were integrated with techniques from program analysis and automata theory. Again, a separate scientific community evolved.

Goals of the Seminar

There is clearly not just competition but also synergy among the three different approaches discussed in the previous section. For example, SMT solvers are successfully applied in program analysis and first-order provers are used in interactive systems. The KeY system is the result of combining an interactive approach to program verification with a high degree of automation. However, such combinations often raise questions and problems that require more interaction between the communities involved. These include

  • exchange of formats for theories and proofs
  • encoding of higher-order problems into first-order logic
  • extension of automatic first-order provers with specific theories or abstraction techniques
  • using automatic provers as servers that allow to incrementally add and delete formulas
  • orchestration of interleaved automated and interactive inference
  • rendering results of automated tools in human-readable form
  • generation of proof certificates
  • exploiting synergies between Abstract Interpretation and SMT solvers
  • invariant inference, especially for quantified formulas
  • exploiting program structure for efficient search
  • test generation and support from SMT solvers
  • programming language support for program analysis

The Dagstuhl seminar brought together the best researchers working on interactive and automatic deduction methods and tools, with a special emphasis on applications to program analysis and verification. In total we had 52 participants, mostly from Europe, but also from USA, Israel, and Australia. A good balance between more senior and junior participants was maintained. The program consisted of 39 relatively short talks, which gave ample time for discussion, both during and after the talks as well as during the meals and in the evenings. Altogether, we perceived the seminar as a very successful one, which allowed for cross-fertilization between research on interactive and on automated deduction. Moreover, it also helped to bridge gaps between foundational research on these topics and application-driven approaches; e.g., the transfer of new theoretical results into applications, or the discovery of new research problems motivated by applications.


Teilnehmer
  • Franz Baader (TU Dresden, DE) [dblp]
  • Domagoj Babic (Synopsys Inc. - Mountain View, US)
  • Thomas Ball (Microsoft Corporation - Redmond, US) [dblp]
  • Peter Baumgartner (NICTA - Canberra, AU) [dblp]
  • Bernhard Beckert (Universität Koblenz-Landau, DE) [dblp]
  • Nikolaj S. Bjørner (Microsoft Corporation - Redmond, US) [dblp]
  • Maria Paola Bonacina (University of Verona, IT) [dblp]
  • Richard Bubel (Chalmers UT - Göteborg, SE) [dblp]
  • Michael Codish (Ben Gurion University - Beer Sheva, IL) [dblp]
  • Carsten Fuhs (RWTH Aachen, DE) [dblp]
  • Ulrich Furbach (Universität Koblenz-Landau, DE) [dblp]
  • Jürgen Giesl (RWTH Aachen, DE) [dblp]
  • Georges Gonthier (Microsoft Research UK - Cambridge, GB) [dblp]
  • Reiner Hähnle (Chalmers UT - Göteborg, SE) [dblp]
  • Thomas C. Hales (University of Pittsburgh, US) [dblp]
  • Krystof Hoder (University of Manchester, GB)
  • Ranjit Jhala (University of California - San Diego, US) [dblp]
  • Deepak Kapur (University of New Mexico - Albuquerque, US) [dblp]
  • Vladimir Klebanov (Universität Koblenz-Landau, DE) [dblp]
  • Laura Kovács (ETH Zürich, CH) [dblp]
  • Alexander Krauss (TU München, DE)
  • Viktor Kuncak (EPFL - Lausanne, CH) [dblp]
  • Assia Mahboubi (Ecole Polytechnique - Palaiseau, FR) [dblp]
  • Claude Marché (University of Paris South XI, FR) [dblp]
  • Aart Middeldorp (Universität Innsbruck, AT) [dblp]
  • Wojciech Mostowski (Radboud University Nijmegen, NL) [dblp]
  • Tobias Nipkow (TU München, DE) [dblp]
  • Michael Norrish (NICTA - Canberra, AU) [dblp]
  • Albert Oliveras (Polytechnic University of Catalonia, ES) [dblp]
  • Wolfgang J. Paul (Universität des Saarlandes, DE) [dblp]
  • Brigitte Pientka (McGill University - Montreal, CA) [dblp]
  • André Platzer (Carnegie Mellon University, US) [dblp]
  • Zvonimir Rakamaric (University of British Columbia - Vancouver, CA) [dblp]
  • Albert Rubio (UPC - Barcelona, ES) [dblp]
  • Andrey Rybalchenko (MPI-SWS - Saarbrücken, DE) [dblp]
  • Renate Schmidt (University of Manchester, GB) [dblp]
  • Manfred Schmidt-Schauss (Universität Frankfurt, DE) [dblp]
  • Peter H. Schmitt (KIT - Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, DE) [dblp]
  • Peter Schneider-Kamp (University of Southern Denmark - Odense, DK) [dblp]
  • Gert Smolka (Universität des Saarlandes, DE) [dblp]
  • Viorica Sofronie-Stokkermans (MPI für Informatik - Saarbrücken, DE) [dblp]
  • Kurt Stenzel (Universität Augsburg, DE)
  • Aaron Stump (University of Iowa - Iowa City, US) [dblp]
  • Laurent Théry (INRIA Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, FR) [dblp]
  • René Thiemann (Universität Innsbruck, AT) [dblp]
  • Christian Urban (TU München, DE) [dblp]
  • Andrei Voronkov (University of Manchester, GB) [dblp]
  • Christoph Walther (TU Darmstadt, DE)
  • Christoph Weidenbach (MPI für Informatik - Saarbrücken, DE) [dblp]
  • Benjamin Weiß (KIT - Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, DE)
  • Makarius Wenzel (TU München, DE) [dblp]
  • Freek Wiedijk (Radboud University Nijmegen, NL) [dblp]

Verwandte Seminare
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 9310: Deduction (1993-03-08 - 1993-03-12) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 9512: Deduction (1995-03-20 - 1995-03-24) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 9709: Deduction (1997-02-24 - 1997-02-28) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 99091: Deduction (1999-02-28 - 1999-03-05) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 01101: Deduction (2001-03-04 - 2001-03-09) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 03171: Deduction and Infinite-state Model Checking (2003-04-21 - 2003-04-25) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 05431: Deduction and Applications (2005-10-23 - 2005-10-28) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 07401: Deduction and Decision Procedures (2007-09-30 - 2007-10-05) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 13411: Deduction and Arithmetic (2013-10-06 - 2013-10-11) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 15381: Information from Deduction: Models and Proofs (2015-09-13 - 2015-09-18) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 17371: Deduction Beyond First-Order Logic (2017-09-10 - 2017-09-15) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 19371: Deduction Beyond Satisfiability (2019-09-08 - 2019-09-13) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 21371: Integrated Deduction (2021-09-12 - 2021-09-17) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 23471: The Next Generation of Deduction Systems: From Composition to Compositionality (2023-11-19 - 2023-11-24) (Details)
  • Dagstuhl-Seminar 26091: Revisiting the Foundations of Deduction in a New World (2026-02-22 - 2026-02-27) (Details)