04. – 07. Januar 2016, Dagstuhl-Seminar 16012

Global Measurements: Practice and Experience


Arthur W. Berger (Akamai Technologies – Cambridge, US)
Philip Eardley (British Telecom R&D – Ipswich, GB)
Jörg Ott (TU München, DE)
Jürgen Schönwälder (Jacobs Universität – Bremen, DE)


Vaibhav Bajpai (Jacobs University Bremen, DE)

Auskunft zu diesem Dagstuhl-Seminar erteilt

Dagstuhl Service Team


Dagstuhl Report, Volume 6, Issue 1 Dagstuhl Report
Dagstuhl's Impact: Dokumente verfügbar


Several large-scale Internet measurement platforms have been deployed during the last years in order to understand how the Internet is performing, to observe how it is evolving, and to determine where failures or degradations occur. Examples are the CAIDA Archipelago (Ark) platform [6] (used for Internet topology discovery and detecting congestion on interdomain links), the SamKnows platform [4] (used by regulators and network operators to study network performance), the RIPE Atlas platform [3, 5] (that provides measurement services to network operators and researchers), the Netradar system [8] (for performing wireless performance measurements), and the BISmark project [9]. European collaborative research incorporate measurement results into network management systems (e.g., Leone) [2]. Related projects (e.g., Flamingo) [1] are increasingly working with measurement data from these platforms. Large-scale measurements are meanwhile also used to drive network operations or to dynamically adjust how services are delivered to customers. Content Delivery Network (CDN) providers use measurement data to optimize content caches and to tune load balancing algorithms. One key challenge is that global Internet measurement systems can generate large amounts of data that need to be processed to derive relevant information.

This seminar (#16012) was a followup of the Dagstuhl seminar on Global Measurement Frameworks (#13472) [7]. The main focus of the first seminar was an exchange of ideas on the development of global measurement infrastructures, frameworks and associated metrics. Some of this work is now further pursued in standardization bodies [4] such as the IETF Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance (LMAP) working group and the Broadband Forum. The goal of this followup seminar was to focus on the experience obtained with different metrics, tools, and data analysis techniques. It provided a forum for researchers to exchange their experience with different practices to conduct global measurements. The aim was to identify what works well in certain contexts, what has proven problematic in other contexts, and identify open issues that need further research. The seminar approached this by looking at three distinct dimensions: (a) Measurement metrics, (b) data processing technologies and (c) data analysis methodologies. Some key questions were:

  1. Which metrics have been found useful for measuring Quality of Experience (QoE) of certain classes of services? Which metrics have been found problematic? Is it possible to find indicators for good metrics and problematic metrics?
  2. Which technologies have been found useful for storing and processing large amounts of measurement data? Which technologies were found to be problematic? Are there new promising technologies that may be used in the future? What are the specific requirements for dealing with large-scale measurement data and how do they relate to or differ from other big data applications?
  3. Which data analysis techniques have been found to be useful? Which data analysis techniques have been found to be problematic? Are there any novel promising techniques that need further research and development?

Although at the seminar the participants chose to organize the discussions on more general topics than these specific questions, during the discussions most of these questions were addressed to one degree or another.


  1. Flamingo – Management of the Future Internet. [Online; accessed 18-January-2016].
  2. Leone – From Global Measurements to Local Management. [Online; accessed 18-January-2016].
  3. RIPE Atlas: A Global Internet Measurement Network. Internet Protocol Journal, September 2015. URL:
  4. V. Bajpai and J. Schönwälder. A Survey on Internet Performance Measurement Platforms and Related Standardization Efforts. Communications Surveys Tutorials, IEEE, 17(3):1313–1341, thirdquarter 2015. doi:10.1109/COMST.2015.2418435.
  5. Vaibhav Bajpai, Steffie Jacob Eravuchira, and Jürgen Schönwälder. Lessons Learned From Using the RIPE Atlas Platform for Measurement Research. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 45(3):35–42, July 2015. doi:10.1145/2805789.2805796
  6. kc claffy. The 7th Workshop on Active Internet Measurements (AIMS7) Report. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 46(1):50–57, January 2016. doi:10.1145/2875951.2875960.
  7. Philip Eardley, Marco Mellia, Jörg Ott, Jürgen Schönwälder, and Henning Schulzrinne. Global Measurement Framework (Dagstuhl Seminar 13472). Dagstuhl Reports, 2014. doi:
  8. S. Sonntag, J. Manner, and L. Schulte. Netradar – Measuring the wireless world. WiOpt’13, May 2013.
  9. Srikanth Sundaresan, Sam Burnett, Nick Feamster, and Walter De Donato. BISmark: A Testbed for Deploying Measurements and Applications in Broadband Access Networks. USENIX ATC’14, pages 383–394, 2014. URL:
  10. B. Trammell, P. Casas, D. Rossi, A. Bar, Z. Houidi, I. Leontiadis, T. Szemethy, and M. Mellia. mPlane: an Intelligent Measurement Plane for the Internet. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(5):148–156, May 2014. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2014.6815906
Summary text license
  Creative Commons BY 3.0 Unported license
  Vaibhav Bajpai and Arthur W. Berger and Philip Eardley and Jörg Ott and Jürgen Schönwälder

Related Dagstuhl-Seminar


  • Modelling / Simulation
  • Networks
  • World Wide Web / Internet


  • Internet measurements
  • Quality of experience
  • Network management
  • Traffic engineering


In der Reihe Dagstuhl Reports werden alle Dagstuhl-Seminare und Dagstuhl-Perspektiven-Workshops dokumentiert. Die Organisatoren stellen zusammen mit dem Collector des Seminars einen Bericht zusammen, der die Beiträge der Autoren zusammenfasst und um eine Zusammenfassung ergänzt.


Download Übersichtsflyer (PDF).

Dagstuhl's Impact

Bitte informieren Sie uns, wenn eine Veröffentlichung ausgehend von Ihrem Seminar entsteht. Derartige Veröffentlichungen werden von uns in der Rubrik Dagstuhl's Impact separat aufgelistet  und im Erdgeschoss der Bibliothek präsentiert.


Es besteht weiterhin die Möglichkeit, eine umfassende Kollektion begutachteter Arbeiten in der Reihe Dagstuhl Follow-Ups zu publizieren.