Suche auf der Schloss Dagstuhl Webseite
Sie suchen nach Informationen auf den Webseiten der einzelnen Seminare? - Dann:
Nicht fündig geworden? - Einige unserer Dienste laufen auf separaten Webseiten mit jeweils eigener Suche. Bitte beachten Sie folgende Liste:
Schloss Dagstuhl - LZI - Logo
Schloss Dagstuhl Services
Innerhalb dieser Seite:
Externe Seiten:
  • DOOR (zum Registrieren eines Dagstuhl Aufenthaltes)
  • DOSA (zum Beantragen künftiger Dagstuhl Seminare oder Dagstuhl Perspektiven Workshops)
Innerhalb dieser Seite:
Externe Seiten:
Innerhalb dieser Seite:
Externe Seiten:
  • die Informatik-Bibliographiedatenbank dblp

Dagstuhl-Seminar 23062

Programming Language Processing

( 05. Feb – 10. Feb, 2023 )

(zum Vergrößern in der Bildmitte klicken)

Bitte benutzen Sie folgende Kurz-Url zum Verlinken dieser Seite:



Gemeinsame Dokumente


Our 5-day Dagstuhl Seminar on "Programming Language Processing" (PLP) brought together researchers and practitioners from the software engineering, programming languages, and natural language processing communities The seminar focused on activities prepared ahead by the participants, such as talks, demos of tools and challenges, and tutorials, as well as informal discussions anchored around the prepared activities. We provided each participant who wanted to present their work an opportunity for doing so. In addition, we asked specific people to present specific topics, e.g., experts of a particularly relevant subfield to prepare a tutorial or creators of a particularly relevant tool to give a tool demo.

In addition to talks and informal discussions, there were several break-out sessions during which participants discussed specific topics in smaller groups and eventually reported back to the other participants. In particular, we had break-out sessions on the following topics:

  • How (if at all) do AI programming assistants change programming?
  • Interpreting neural models of code.
  • Do we still need per-task models, or do large language models solve it all?
  • What software engineering tasks are not yet explored (sufficiently) by neural models?
  • How should and will computer science education change in response to ML-based coding tools?
  • What kinds of guarantees can we expect, and do we want, from ML-based developer tools? What human factors in interacting with ML systems are relevant?
  • How can learned models use existing tools, e.g., compilers and interpreters, to improve their predictions?

As a result of the seminar, several participants plan to launch various follow-up activities, such as joint publications and transferring promising ideas from academia to industry.

Copyright Michael Pradel, Baishakhi Ray, Charles Sutton, and Eran Yahav


Program analysis is at the core of many tools that software developers rely on during their daily work. Instead of analyzing programs in the traditional, symbolic reasoning-based way, there is an increasing interest in learning-based program analysis, both by academic researchers and industry practitioners. A learning-based approach is motivated by the huge amounts of available source code and other data, by the undecidability of practically all interesting program analysis questions, and by recent progress in machine learning and natural language processing. We here call the emerging field of learning-based program analysis "programming language processing" (PLP), in analogy to "natural language processing". Current work shows PLP to be effective for a variety of tasks, including code completion, bug detection, type prediction, program synthesis, code summarization, and program repair.

This Dagstuhl Seminar will bring together researchers and practitioners from three communities – software engineering, programming languages, and natural language processing – providing a unique opportunity for cross-fertilization and inter-disciplinary progress. We will discuss machine learning models of code, integrating learning-based and traditional program analysis, and learning from natural language information associated with software. We expect the seminar to lead to a better understanding of the commonalities and differences between natural and programming languages, a set of standardized tasks and datasets, and an understanding of the challenges and opportunities in industry adoption of PLP.

Topics to be discussed (non-exhaustive list):

  • Effective models of code
  • Techniques for obtaining, cleaning, and preprocessing training data
  • Integrating learning-based and traditional program analysis
  • Learning from natural language information associated with programs
  • Standardized tasks, leaderboards
  • Challenges and opportunities in industry adoption

The main purpose of the seminar is to connect the participants and their respective research ideas. Hence, one expected outcome is new collaborations between the participants, in particular across different subfields of computer science that usually interact only sparsely. As another concrete outcome of the seminar, we plan to write an article that summarizes the current state of PLP, open challenges, and a set of specific tasks the community could focus on. The article should neither survey all existing work nor focus on one or two specific technical contributions. Instead, the goal is to provide a forward-looking perspective of PLP to a broader, general computer science audience.

Copyright Michael Pradel, Baishakhi Ray, Charles Sutton, and Eran Yahav


  • Neural and Evolutionary Computing
  • Programming Languages
  • Software Engineering

  • ML4PL
  • ML4SE
  • Neural Software Analysis