05. – 10. September 2021, Dagstuhl-Seminar 21362

Structure and Learning


Tiansi Dong (Universität Bonn, DE)
Achim Rettinger (Universität Trier, DE)
Jie Tang (Tsinghua University – Beijing, CN)
Barbara Tversky (Columbia University – New York, US)
Frank van Harmelen (VU University Amsterdam, NL)

Auskunft zu diesem Dagstuhl-Seminar erteilt

Dagstuhl Service Team


Dagstuhl Report, Volume 11, Issue 8 Dagstuhl Report
Gemeinsame Dokumente


Deep Learning systems are the hope of the fifth industrial revolution. However, recent studies have found that Deep Learning systems can be easily manipulated, i.e. in Natural Language Understanding, Object Recognition. How to introduce structures into Deep Learning systems to improve reliability and performance has become a hot topic in Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML), Semantic Web (SW) communities around the world. The aim of the seminar is to bring together interdisciplinary researchers around the world for constructive discussions on this theme, in particular, it intends to establish international collaborations to promote computational Humor, with the hope to let AI bring more joy, more laugh into the world, and do more good for the society.

The hybrid seminar is structured in the form of Talks, Working Groups, and Open questions. The seminar started with the talk "Hybrid AI for Humor". The dynamic semantics of humor is beyond the reach of the classic symbolic AI, the deep learning paradigm, and current neural-symbolic integration methods, but can be captured by the neural geometric embedding, in terms of rotating sphere embedding. This novel embedding is rooted in Qualitative Spatial Representation (QSR) in symbolic AI and Learning Representation (LR) in neural ML. The former tries to symbolically delineate the basic spatial knowledge that humans have and possible ways that this knowledge can be used as a reference for abstract knowledge in other domains. LR aims at learning latent feature knowledge from data. The motivation and a geometric approach to realizing the unification were introduced in the talk "Rotating Spheres - A New Wheel for Neuro-Symbolic Unification". The motion of rotating spheres in high-dimensional space is served as a computational model to simulate (1) the motion of the physical world, (2) the circular interaction among the mind, the body, and the world (called spraction - a contraction of space, action, and abstraction, in which actions in space create abstractions).

The motion of the physical world is vividly explained in the talk "Rotating Spheres in the Milky Way". This spraction process is explained in the talk ``Thinking with the Body and the World'', which can guide the design of novel cognitive robots, and promote novel cognitive architectures. Two topics were covered by the talk "Learning about Language and Action for Robots", and the talk "Neural-Symbolic Models, Dual-Process Theories, and Cognitive Architectures".

In primates, the same brain structures that support spatial thinking also support conceptual thinking, Single cells in hippocampus gather multi-media information from different memories in the brain to represent places in space, events in time, ideas in conceptual spaces. Update-to-date research of neural simulation is introduced by Volker Tresp with the talk "Knowledge Graph and Cognitive Learning: from Perception to Memory Embedding", which maps embedding models to various cognitive memory functions, in particular to semantic and concept memory, episodic memory, sensory memory, short-term memory, and working memory.

Spatial thinking is multi-modal and established and distorted by our actions and perceptions of the spaces we interact in. This raises two questions: What are good representations for video understanding? and how to compute symbolic rules that the models have learned from the training data? Juergen Gall introduced holistic video understanding and argued the potential of hybrid approaches that combine neural networks with symbolic AI for video understanding and reasoning. Cuenca Grau, Bernado gave the talk "Characterizing Graph Neural Networks Using Logical Rules". He formally defines what it means for a set of logical rules to characterize the behavior of a model and proposes a GNN-based architecture that admits a characterization in terms of Datalog rules.

Spatial thinking is evident in the ways we think and the ways we externalize thought, for example, through words. Our words act on thought the way we act on objects. The philosophy of spatial thinking challenges the computational approach to natural language processing and understanding. Roberto Navigli argued that Natural Language Understanding (NLU) is particularly challenging, as this requires the machine to go beyond processing strings to reach a semantic level. Recent developments and challenges were discussed through three key tasks in NLU, namely Word Sense Disambiguation, Semantic Role Labeling, and Semantic Parsing. Zhiyuan Liu argued that knowledge (including symbols, embeddings, or models) is the key to a deeper understanding of human languages and that big pretrained language models can be regarded as the most advanced approach to model knowledge and to capture knowledge (including commonsense) from plain text and that the key challenge is how to incorporate both open data and structural knowledge. Alexander Mehler reviewed problems of neural network-based language learning, suggested to introduce the concept of cognitive maps and spatial information processing, and sketched a synergistic model that relates the dynamics of distributed information processing to bias interaction. Jie Tang introduced Wu-Dao, China's first homegrown super-scale intelligent model system, with the goal of building an ultra-large-scale cognitive-oriented pretraining model to focus on essential problems in general artificial intelligence from a cognitive perspective. Wu-Dao substantially outperforms BERT on the SuperGLUE natural language understanding benchmark with the same amount of pre-training data. Alam Mehwish discusses the characteristics of the existing benchmark datasets for the task of KG Completion, and limitations of the existing benchmark datasets and targets those issues in the generation of LiterallyWikidata.

Another externalization of spatial thinking is through graphics. In the talk "Semi-Riemannian Graph Convolutional Networks", Steffen Staab introduced their new geodesic tools that allow for extending neural network operations into geodesically disconnected semi-Riemannian manifolds. Thomas Liebig introduced using p-adic coding and computation for structured domains or domains with inherent granularity.

The ultimate form of spatial thinking is comics (a form of humor, the most creative form of storytelling), which typically show bodies acting in space. Humor is used as a testbed and lighthouse for the development of AI and machine learning. In the talk "Ethics of AI Humor" Kiki explained how humor has frustrated symbolic and statistic AI approaches; in the talk "Knowledge and Inferences Needed for Humor" Julia Rayz introduced recent advances in transformer-based approaches, and raised open questions.

Working groups are the main components of the seminar. The hybrid seminar provides an excellent chance to practice the situation that participants can continue to work together after this seminar, which is the main outcome of this seminar.

The seminar ended with the discussion "Boxology for Hybrid Learning and Reasoning Systems" chaired by Frank van Harmelen.

Summary text license
  Creative Commons BY 4.0
  Tiansi Dong, Achim Rettinger, Jie Tang, Barbara Tversky, and Frank van Harmelen


  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Symbolic Computation


  • Neural-symbol unification
  • Knowledge graph
  • Machine learning


In der Reihe Dagstuhl Reports werden alle Dagstuhl-Seminare und Dagstuhl-Perspektiven-Workshops dokumentiert. Die Organisatoren stellen zusammen mit dem Collector des Seminars einen Bericht zusammen, der die Beiträge der Autoren zusammenfasst und um eine Zusammenfassung ergänzt.


Download Übersichtsflyer (PDF).

Dagstuhl's Impact

Bitte informieren Sie uns, wenn eine Veröffentlichung ausgehend von Ihrem Seminar entsteht. Derartige Veröffentlichungen werden von uns in der Rubrik Dagstuhl's Impact separat aufgelistet  und im Erdgeschoss der Bibliothek präsentiert.


Es besteht weiterhin die Möglichkeit, eine umfassende Kollektion begutachteter Arbeiten in der Reihe Dagstuhl Follow-Ups zu publizieren.