13. – 16. Juli 2008, Dagstuhl-Seminar 08292

The Study of Visual Aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction


Marc Hassenzahl (Universitöt Koblenz – Landau, DE)
Gitte Lindgaard (Carleton University – Ottawa, CA)
Axel Platz (Siemens AG – München, DE)
Noam Tractinsky (Ben Gurion University – Beer Sheva, IL)

Auskunft zu diesem Dagstuhl-Seminar erteilt

Dagstuhl Service Team


Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings DROPS

Press Room (German only)


This seminar intended “to gather a group of about 25-30 participants who will exchange ideas, views, and case study results that address the seminar's themes.” We aimed at discussing methodologies and measures in the study of visual aesthetics in HCI, to explore design antecedents of aesthetic interactive systems, as well as consequences of aesthetic design or aesthetic experience in HCI. We anticipated that the outcome of the seminar “will contribute to clarifying the concept, provide an overview of existing practical resources such as measurement scales, solidify the body of knowledge in this area, and generally spark interest in aesthetics in the HCI community.”

21 people participated in the seminar. This seminar explored various aspects of the study of visual aesthetics in human-computer interaction (HCI). The growing attention that this field is gaining from the HCI community is manifested by the increasing rate of published-, and in-progress research, and by the emphasis espoused by usability- and Usability Experience (UX) practitioners on the importance aesthetic design.

We identified a set of research challenges that this emerging field needs to discuss. These can be broadly classified into four categories, which can be depicted as belonging to two major axes. The first deals with theory building vs. measurement. It includes the development of theoretical and conceptual foundations of the field on the one hand, and the identification and development of measures and research methods that are appropriate for studying it on the other hand. The second axis contrasts antecedents of aesthetic design with its consequences. The context of the aesthetic experience and the contingencies that affect reactions to aesthetic interactive products and applications fall between those two axes.

One of the seminar’s goals was to collect examples and case studies of visual aesthetics in interactive systems. Some participants have discussed the implications of aesthetics for the design of interactive systems and demonstrated the applications of aesthetic principles to design (Löwgren). Fishwick places aesthetics within the context of ubiquitous computing. He demonstrated the application of aesthetics to software representation (e.g., in Second Life) with the ultimate intent of popularizing software engineering.

Major debates and future directions

The seminar concluded with discussions of research topics that need to be addressed further. These include the following:

  • Considering visual aesthetics as a dynamic process:
  • Considering the transition of computing from an interaction paradigm to the computing-as-medium paradigm and the consequences of such a transition (Nake).
  • The educational implications of the importance of visual aesthetics in HCI (Sutcliffe). Only very few in the HCI community are “visual designers”. Who will teach aesthetics to most of the community and how (educational programs)?
  • Is the aesthetic experience and resulting evaluation cognitive or emotional? Perceptual and sensory or reflective and intellectual? Necessarily wholistic or also decomposable?

Finally, it was recommended that in order to facilitate further research efforts and improve communication among group members, we should develop a web site and/or a wiki allowing people to share resources and ideas.

A Dagstuhl-Seminar-Report about the previous Dagstuhl Seminar 02291: Aesthetic Computing (14.-19. July 2002) is still available here


  • Web
  • Society / HCI


  • Human-computer interaction
  • Aesthetics
  • Beauty
  • Design
  • Hedonics
  • Concepts
  • Measurement


In der Reihe Dagstuhl Reports werden alle Dagstuhl-Seminare und Dagstuhl-Perspektiven-Workshops dokumentiert. Die Organisatoren stellen zusammen mit dem Collector des Seminars einen Bericht zusammen, der die Beiträge der Autoren zusammenfasst und um eine Zusammenfassung ergänzt.


Download Übersichtsflyer (PDF).


Es besteht weiterhin die Möglichkeit, eine umfassende Kollektion begutachteter Arbeiten in der Reihe Dagstuhl Follow-Ups zu publizieren.

Dagstuhl's Impact

Bitte informieren Sie uns, wenn eine Veröffentlichung ausgehend von
Ihrem Seminar entsteht. Derartige Veröffentlichungen werden von uns in der Rubrik Dagstuhl's Impact separat aufgelistet  und im Erdgeschoss der Bibliothek präsentiert.