07. – 12. Oktober 2018, Dagstuhl-Seminar 18411

Progressive Data Analysis and Visualization


Jean-Daniel Fekete (INRIA Saclay – Orsay, FR)
Danyel Fisher (Honeycomb – San Francisco, US)
Arnab Nandi (Ohio State University – Columbus, US)
Michael Sedlmair (Universität Stuttgart, DE)

Auskunft zu diesem Dagstuhl-Seminar erteilt

Dagstuhl Service Team


Dagstuhl Report, Volume 8, Issue 10 Dagstuhl Report
Gemeinsame Dokumente
Programm des Dagstuhl-Seminars [pdf]


We live in an era where data is abundant and growing rapidly; databases to handle big data are sprawling out past memory and computation limits, and across distributed systems. New hardware and software systems have been built to sustain this growth in terms of storage management and predictive computation. However, these infrastructures, while good for data at scale, do not support data exploration well.

The concept of exploratory data analysis (EDA) was introduced by John Tukey in the 1970's and is now a commonplace in visual analytics. EDA allows users to make sense of data with little or no known model; it is essential in many application domains, from network security and fraud detection to epidemiology and preventive medicine. For most datasets, it is considered a best practice to explore data before beginning to construct formal hypotheses. Data exploration is done through an iterative loop where analysts interact with data through computations that return results, usually shown with visualizations. Analysts reacting to these results and visualizations issue new commands triggering new computations until they answer their questions.

However, due to human cognitive constraints, exploration needs highly responsive system response times (see at 500 ms, users change their querying behavior; past five or ten seconds, users abandon tasks or lose attention. As datasets grow and computations become more complex, response time suffers. To address this problem, a new computation paradigm has emerged in the last decade under several names: online aggregation in the database community; progressive, incremental, or iterative visualization in other communities. It consists of splitting long computations into a series of approximate results improving with time; the results are then returned at a controlled pace.

This paradigm addresses scalability problems, as analysts can keep their attention on the results of long analyses as they arrive progressively. Initial research has shown promising results in progressive analysis for both big database queries and for machine learning.

The widespread use of progressive data analysis has been hampered by a chicken-and-egg problem: data visualization researchers do not have online database systems to work against, and database researchers do not have tools that will display the results of their work. As a result, progressive visualization systems are based on simulated systems or early prototypes. In many cases, neither side has currently incentive, skills, or resources to build the components needed.

Recently, data analysis researchers and practitioners have started conversations with their colleagues involved in the data analysis pipeline to combine their efforts. This standard pipeline includes the following core communities: data management, statistics and machine learning and interactive visualization. These initial conversations have led to fruitful evolutions of systems, combining two or three of these communities to complete a pipeline. Database and visualization have collaborated to create systems allowing progressive, approximate query results. Machine-learning and visualization have collaborated to create systems combining progressive multidimensional projections with appropriate scalable visualizations, such as Progressive t-SNE. Most current machine learning algorithms are designed to examine the entirety of a dataset. A major contribution of work like Progressive t-SNE is to have a decomposable algorithm that can compute a meaningful partial result, which then can be passed on to a visual interface for fluent exploration. In these few existing collaborations, the researchers are able to work together and find concrete mechanisms by adapting existing systems for these without re-building them from the ground up. A systematic and widespread linkage between the involved communities, however, is still largely absent.

This Dagstuhl seminar brought the researchers and practitioners who have started this software evolutionary process to exchange their ideas, experience, and visions. We are convinced that in the forthcoming years, progressive data analysis will become a leading paradigm for data exploration systems, but will require major changes in the algorithms and data structures in use today. The scientific communities involved need to understand the constraints and possibilities from their colleagues to converge faster, with a deeper awareness of the implications of this paradigm shift. The implications are technical, but also human, both perceptual and cognitive, and the seminar will provide a holistic view of the problem by gathering specialists from all the communities.

This summary summarizes the outcomes of our seminar. The seminar focused on

  • defining and formalizing the concept of progressive data analysis,
  • addressing fundamental issues for progressive data analysis, such as software architecture, management of uncertainty, and human aspects,
  • identifying evaluation methods to assess the quality of progressive systems, and threats to research on the topic,
  • examining applications in data science, machine learning, and time-series analysis.

As a major result from the seminar, the following problems have been identified:

  1. Implementing fully functional progressive systems will be difficult, since the progressive model is incompatible with most of the existing data analysis stack,
  2. The human side of progressive data analysis requires further research to investigate how visualization systems and user interfaces should be adapted to help humans cope with progressiveness,
  3. The potentials of progressive data analysis are huge, in particular it would reconcile exploratory data analysis with big data and modern machine learning methods, item
  4. data analysis and visualization mainstream in research and application domains.
  Creative Commons BY 3.0 Unported license
  Jean-Daniel Fekete, Danyel Fisher, and Michael Sedlmair


  • Artificial Intelligence / Robotics
  • Data Bases / Information Retrieval
  • Society / Human-computer Interaction


  • Visualization
  • Visual analytics
  • Database
  • Big-data
  • Human-computer interaction


Bücher der Teilnehmer 

Buchausstellung im Erdgeschoss der Bibliothek

(nur in der Veranstaltungswoche).


In der Reihe Dagstuhl Reports werden alle Dagstuhl-Seminare und Dagstuhl-Perspektiven-Workshops dokumentiert. Die Organisatoren stellen zusammen mit dem Collector des Seminars einen Bericht zusammen, der die Beiträge der Autoren zusammenfasst und um eine Zusammenfassung ergänzt.


Download Übersichtsflyer (PDF).


Es besteht weiterhin die Möglichkeit, eine umfassende Kollektion begutachteter Arbeiten in der Reihe Dagstuhl Follow-Ups zu publizieren.

Dagstuhl's Impact

Bitte informieren Sie uns, wenn eine Veröffentlichung ausgehend von
Ihrem Seminar entsteht. Derartige Veröffentlichungen werden von uns in der Rubrik Dagstuhl's Impact separat aufgelistet  und im Erdgeschoss der Bibliothek präsentiert.