11. – 16. März 2018, Dagstuhl-Seminar 18111

Loop Optimization


Sebastian Hack (Universität des Saarlandes, DE)
Paul H. J. Kelly (Imperial College London, GB)
Christian Lengauer (Universität Passau, DE)

Auskunft zu diesem Dagstuhl-Seminar erteilt

Dagstuhl Service Team


Dagstuhl Report, Volume 8, Issue 3 Dagstuhl Report
Dagstuhl's Impact: Dokumente verfügbar



Loop optimization is at the heart of effective program optimization - even if the source language is too abstract to contain loop constructs explicitly as, e.g., in a functional style or a domain-specific language. Loops provide a major opportunity to improve the performance of a program because they represent compactly a large volume of accessed data and executed instructions. Because the clock frequency of processors fails to continue to grow (end of Dennard scaling), the only way in which the execution of programs can be accelerated is by increasing their throughput with a compiler: by increasing parallelism and improving data locality. This puts loop optimization in the center of performance optimization.


The quick and easy way to optimize a loop nest, still frequently used in practice, is by restructuring the source program, e.g., by permuting, tiling or skewing the loop nest. Beside being laborious and error-prone, this approach favors modifications that can be easily recognized and carried out, but which need not be the most suitable choice. A much better approach is to search automatically for optimization options in a mathematical model of the iteration space, in which all options are equally detectable and the quality of each option can be assessed precisely.

Recently, the polyhedral compilation community has produced a set of robust and powerful libraries that contain a variety of algorithms for the manipulation of Presburger sets, including all standard polyhedral compilation techniques. They can be incorporated in a program analysis to make other compiler optimizations more precise and powerful, like optimizers and code generators for domain-specific languages, or aggressive optimizers for high-performance computing.

Polyhedral loop optimization relies on strict constraints on the structure of the loop nest and may incur a computationally complex program analysis, based on integer linear programming. The optimization problems become much simpler when information at load or run time is available, i.e., the optimization is done just-in-time. Also, the search for the best optimization can be supported by other techniques, e.g., auto-tuning, machine learning or genetic algorithms. While these techniques are all fully automatic, engineering of software with robust performance characteristics requires programmers to have some level of explicit control over the data distribution and communication costs. However, manually optimized code is far too complicated to maintain. Thus, a major research area concerns the design of tools that allow developers to guide or direct analysis (e.g., via dependence summaries or domain-specific code generation) and optimization (e.g., via directives, sketches and abstractions for schedules and data partitioning).


The goal of this seminar was to generate a new synergy in loop optimization research by bringing together representatives of the major different schools of thought in this field. The key unifying idea is to formulate loop optimization as a mathematical problem, by characterizing the optimization space and objectives with respect to a suitable model.

One school is focused on reasoning about scheduling and parallelization using a geometric, "polyhedral", model of iteration spaces which supports powerful tools for measuring parallelism, locality and communication -- but which is quite limited in its applicability.

Another major school treats program optimization as program synthesis, for example by equational rewriting, generating a potentially large space of variants which can be pruned with respect to properties like load balance and locality. This approach has flourished in certain application domains, but also suffers from problems with generalization.

A third family of loop optimization approaches tackles program optimization through program generation and symbolic evaluation. Generative approaches, such as explicit staging, support programmers in taking explicit control over implementation details at a high level of abstraction.

The seminar explored the interplay of these various loop optimization techniques and fostered the communication in the wide-ranging research community of model-based loop optimization. Participants represented the various loop optimization approaches but also application domains in high-performance computing.


The seminar succeeded in making the participants aware of common goals and relations between different approaches. Consensus emerged on the potential and importance of tensor contractions and tensor comprehensions as an intermediate representation. There was also some excitement in connecting the classical dependence-based optimization with newly emerging ideas in deriving parallel algorithms from sequentially-dependent code automatically. Guided automatic search and inference turned out to be a dominant theme. Another important insight was that the optimization criteria currently in use are often too coarse-grained and do not deliver satisfactory performance. More precise hardware models are needed to guide optimization. This will require a closer collaboration with the performance modeling and engineering community.

It was agreed that publications and collaborations fueled by the seminar will acknowledge Schloss Dagstuhl.

Summary text license
  Creative Commons BY 3.0 Unported license
  Sebastian Hack, Paul H. J. Kelly, and Christian Lengauer

Related Dagstuhl-Seminar


  • Optimization / Scheduling
  • Programming Languages / Compiler
  • Software Engineering


  • Autotuning
  • Dependence analysis
  • Just-in-time (JIT)
  • Loop parallelization
  • Parallel programming
  • Polyhedron model


In der Reihe Dagstuhl Reports werden alle Dagstuhl-Seminare und Dagstuhl-Perspektiven-Workshops dokumentiert. Die Organisatoren stellen zusammen mit dem Collector des Seminars einen Bericht zusammen, der die Beiträge der Autoren zusammenfasst und um eine Zusammenfassung ergänzt.


Download Übersichtsflyer (PDF).

Dagstuhl's Impact

Bitte informieren Sie uns, wenn eine Veröffentlichung ausgehend von Ihrem Seminar entsteht. Derartige Veröffentlichungen werden von uns in der Rubrik Dagstuhl's Impact separat aufgelistet  und im Erdgeschoss der Bibliothek präsentiert.


Es besteht weiterhin die Möglichkeit, eine umfassende Kollektion begutachteter Arbeiten in der Reihe Dagstuhl Follow-Ups zu publizieren.