03. – 08. April 2011, Dagstuhl Seminar 11141

Plan Recognition


Tamim Asfour (KIT – Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, DE)
Christopher W. Geib (University of Edinburgh, GB)
Robert P. Goldman (SIFT – Minneapolis, US)
Henry A. Kautz (University of Rochester, US)

Auskunft zu diesem Dagstuhl Seminar erteilt

Dagstuhl Service Team


Dagstuhl Report, Volume 1, Issue 4 Dagstuhl Report
Gemeinsame Dokumente
Programm des Dagstuhl Seminars [pdf]


Plan recognition, activity recognition, and intent recognition all involve making inferences about other actors from observations of their behavior, i.e., their interaction with the environment and with each other. The observed actors may be software agents, robots, or humans. This synergistic area of research combines and unifies techniques from user modeling, machine vision, intelligent user interfaces, human/computer interaction, autonomous and multi-agent systems, natural language understanding, and machine learning. It plays a crucial role in a wide variety of applications including:

  • assistive technology
  • software assistants
  • computer and network security
  • behavior recognition
  • coordination in robots and software agents
  • e-commerce and collaborative filtering

This Dagstuhl seminar brought together researchers with a wide range of interests and backgrounds related to plan and activity recognition. It featured a substantial set of longer tutorials on aspects of plan and activity recognition, and related topics and useful methods, as a way of establishing a common vocabulary and shared basis of understanding. These were:

  • Plan recognition and discourse;
  • Plan recognition and psychology;
  • Probabilistic methods;
  • Plan recognition and learning;
  • Grammatical methods and
  • Planning and plan recognition.

The common ground constructed by these tutorials provided a basis that individual researchers could build upon when sharing their specific interests and developments.

One challenge to progress in plan recognition is that there has not been a shared agreement about what constitutes plan recognition: what are its inputs and outputs, and what constitutes a good answer. In particular, this has inhibited progress because it is difficult to clearly compare new work in plan recognition with preceding work (quantitative comparisons are almost impossible), there is a paucity of shared data sets, etc. Coming into the seminar, the organizing committee proposed that the field might be improved by the introduction of a plan recognition competition, modeled on competitions in AI planning (the International Planning Competition), SAT solving, etc. Discussions at the seminar concluded that it would be premature to introduce such a competition at this time. Participants felt that a more productive use of community resources would be to develop a shared repository of plan and activity recognition data sets. A number of participants volunteered to provide their data sets, and there has been movement towards establishing a common public repository.


  • Artificial intelligence
  • Plan recognition
  • Intent recognition
  • Activity recognition


Bücher der Teilnehmer 

Buchausstellung im Erdgeschoss der Bibliothek

(nur in der Veranstaltungswoche).


In der Reihe Dagstuhl Reports werden alle Dagstuhl-Seminare und Dagstuhl-Perspektiven-Workshops dokumentiert. Die Organisatoren stellen zusammen mit dem Collector des Seminars einen Bericht zusammen, der die Beiträge der Autoren zusammenfasst und um eine Zusammenfassung ergänzt.


Download Übersichtsflyer (PDF).


Es besteht weiterhin die Möglichkeit, eine umfassende Kollektion begutachteter Arbeiten in der Reihe Dagstuhl Follow-Ups zu publizieren.

Dagstuhl's Impact

Bitte informieren Sie uns, wenn eine Veröffentlichung ausgehend von
Ihrem Seminar entsteht. Derartige Veröffentlichungen werden von uns in der Rubrik Dagstuhl's Impact separat aufgelistet  und im Erdgeschoss der Bibliothek präsentiert.