http://www.dagstuhl.de/13411

### October 6 – 11 , 2013, Dagstuhl Seminar 13411

# Deduction and Arithmetic

## Organizers

Nikolaj S. Bjorner (Microsoft Corporation – Redmond, US)

Reiner Hähnle (TU Darmstadt, DE)

Tobias Nipkow (TU München, DE)

Christoph Weidenbach (MPI für Informatik – Saarbrücken, DE)

1 / 2 >

## For support, please contact

## Documents

Dagstuhl Report, Volume 3, Issue 10

Aims & Scope

List of Participants

Shared Documents

Dagstuhl Seminar Schedule [pdf]

## Summary

Arithmetic plays a fundamental role in deduction. Logical constraints over arithmetical properties occur frequently in classical theorems in mathematics, as well as in program analysis and verification. The first automatic theorem prover was an implementation of Presburger Arithmetic in 1954. With the availability of powerful predicate calculus proof procedures some years later, arithmetic would be relegated to the sidelines. Interest in arithmetic revived in the 1980s with the advent of powerful interactive theorem provers that needed and supported arithmetic for their applications. The need for efficient computer aided deduction with support for arithmetic in the area of program analysis and verification recently gave birth to a new technology, so called SMT solvers.

Thus we have three strands of automated deduction: SMT solvers, automated first-order provers, and interactive provers in need of (more) arithmetic.

**SMT** SMT (satisfiability modulo theories) solvers distinguish
themselves by integrating built-in support for a combination of
theories, including prominently the theory of arithmetic. Most often
handling arithmetic formulas in isolation is not
sufficient. Applications typically use a non-disjoint combination of
arithmetic and other theory reasoning. SMT solvers nowadays handle
quantifier-free arithmetic well, but are not directly equipped to
solve arithmetical formulas with quantifiers. Recent progress on
building in quantifier-elimination procedures for linear and
non-linear arithmetic have made practical integration of such richer
arithmetic deduction viable.

**ATP** Research in first-order logic theorem proving used to
concentrate on efficient calculi in general and the integration of
equational theories in particular. It is obvious that further
integration of ``richer'' arithmetic theories into first-order logic
should be done by rather a combination approach than an integration
approach. One major challenge of combining first-order logic calculi
with arithmetic procedures is that of compactness/completeness and
termination. While Boolean combinations of ground atoms, as they are
considered by SMT solvers typically do not cause trouble with
respect to those challenges, combining first-order clauses with an
arithmetic theory can never result in a compact/complete/terminating
calculus, in general. The actual combination typically requires the
solution of purely arithmetic problems in order to establish valid
inferences and simplifications. These problems are of a specific
nature in that the form of the arithmetic formulas and the way they
need to be tested require specific variants of the known arithmetic
procedures.

**ITP** Interactive theorem provers initially came with built-in
decision procedures for quantifier-free linear arithmetic. More
foundational systems then developed new techniques to implement
these decision procedures by reducing them to pure logic, trading
efficiency for guaranteed correctness. Aspects of arithmetic
reasoning are present in deductive software verification systems:
interactive systems combine a number of automatic arithmetic
reasoning methods and control them with heuristics that are specific
for verification. A challenging application of interactive proof and
arithmetic is the Flyspeck project, an effort to formalize Hales's
proof of the Kepler conjecture in an interactive theorem prover.

The Dagstuhl seminar was a timely event that brought together experts in the above subareas of deduction, and in reasoning about arithmetic, to exchange experiences and insights. The research questions pursued and answered included:

- Which arithmetic problems are best solved with which approach?
- How to handle very complex numeric representations such as the IEEE floating-point standard with a high degree of automation?
- Arithmetic in combination with other theories results easily in languages with a very complex decision problem---how can a high degree of automation be obtained nevertheless?
- How can SMT-based reasoning be combined with model-based reasoning?
- What is the best way to incorporate arithmetic simplification available in computer algebra systems into deductive frameworks?
- How can the specific structure of arithmetic problems generated by deduction systems be exploited?

In addition to the technical contributions, the seminar participants attempted in an open discussion session to identify the major trends and open questions around Deduction and Arithmetic.

**License**

Creative Commons BY 3.0 Unported license

Nikolaj S. Bjorner and Reiner Hähnle and Tobias Nipkow and Christoph Weidenbach

## Dagstuhl Seminar Series

- 15381: "Information from Deduction: Models and Proofs" (2015)
- 09411: "Interaction versus Automation: The two Faces of Deduction" (2009)
- 07401: "Deduction and Decision Procedures" (2007)
- 05431: "Deduction and Applications" (2005)
- 03171: "Deduction and Infinite-state Model Checking" (2003)
- 01101: "Deduction" (2001)
- 99091: "Deduction" (1999)
- 9709: "Deduction" (1997)
- 9512: "Deduction" (1995)
- 9310: "Deduction" (1993)

## Classification

- Artificial Intelligence
- Semantics / Formal Methods
- Verification / Logic

## Keywords

- Automated Deduction
- Program Verification
- Arithmetic Constraint Solving